| Review:
(Note:
The
webmaster
got
in
touch
and
informed
us
that
"dessous"
is
in
fact
a
word
for
lingerie.-Eds.)
You
know
how
much
we
like
to
start
off
a
review
by
talking
about
the
name
of
the
site.
But
here we're
a
little
flummoxed
because
we
don't
really
know
what
it
means.
"Dessous"
is,
we
believe,
French
for
underneath.
But
we
asked
someone
who
knows
French
if
it's
also
a
word
for
a
type
of
clothing
and
they
said
they'd
never
heard
of
it.
So
maybe
it's
just
called
Dessous
Gallery
because
it's
concerned
with
the
various
things
women
wear
underneath
their
regular
clothes.
Which
is a
long
way
of
saying
it's
a
lingerie
site.
We're
not
the
fastest
bunnies
in
the
forest
around
here. Basically
what
we
have
here
is
lots
of
models
posing
in
their
undies:
the
black
chemise,
the
white
silk
slip,
the
red
satin
panties.
Like
most
nylon/panty
fetish
sites
it
has
a
retro
flare
to
it
(in
other
words:
no
thongs).
It's
also
very
softcore.
Some
topless
posing,
but
we
only
caught
the
very
odd
glimpse
of
pussy.
And
even
the
posing
is
pretty
demure.
Which
is
another
French
word
that
means
the
opposite
of
slutty. The
site
itself
is
really
simple.
There
are
no
extras
on
tap,
which
keeps
down
the
clutter.
Basically
you
have
a
model
index,
a
model
search,
and
the
usual
photo
and
video
sections.
Quite
a
lot
of
pics
to
look
at.
Nearly
900
galleries
by
our
count.
The
photos
come
in
three
different
sizes
(we're
approximating
slightly
with
the
pixels
here,
but
this
is
close): Good
(600x900),
Medium
(900x13500)
and
Best
(1200x1800).
These
appear
as
G,
M,
and
B on
your
options,
which
confused
us
because
we
initially
thought
they
were
in
descending
order
of
quality
and
stood
for
Good,
Medium,
and
Bad.
Guess
we
should
have
known
that
most
sites
don't
like
to
call
anything
"bad". Told
you
we
aren't
fast
bunnies.
Actually,
it
says
Good,
Medium,
and
Best
on
the
mouseover.
We
just
weren't
paying
attention. The
pics
aren't
bad,
but
they
aren't
anything
fancy
either.
We
definitely
thought
they
should
have
fixed
some
of
the
red-eye
we
saw.
The
sets
are
super-simple.
Usually
it's
just
a
bed
or
they
have
the
model
standing
in
front
of a
sheet
that's
been
hung
from
the
ceiling.
We didn't
really
groove
to
the
viewing
window
that
popped
up
for
individual
pictures. Too
much
going
on.
There
were
only
19
of
them
when
we
visited,
but
the
quality
of
the
downloadable
video
is
very
good:
640x480,
1030
kb/s
going
up
to 720x576,
1200
kb/s
with
the
newer
stuff.
Unfortunately
they
don't
do a
lot
with
them.
They
seem
to
mainly
just
be
video
records
of
the
the
photoshoots,
with
the
photographer
talking
to
the
girl,
posing
her,
and
then
the
flash
going
off,
etc.
And
the
editing
is
really
abrupt,
with
sudden
cuts
to
new
outfits.
So
. .
.
lots
of
content
with
fairly
clean
and
simple
navigation,
a
good
update
schedule
(they
seem
to
be
updating
with
something
new
every
day
now),
and
all
exclusive
stuff
that
hits
the
underwear
niche
right
in
the
ol'
dessous.
Our
major
complaint
was
that
we
thought
it
needed
a
stronger
sense
of
style,
more
of a
"look".
We
also
thought
it
was
too expensive
for
a site
that
still
needs
to
beef
up
its
video
section,
not
to
mention
the
fact
that
a
major
competitor
(if
not
the
dominant
site)
in
this
market,
Only
Tease,
is
$10
cheaper. However,
the
lingerie
here
is
classier
and
more
expensive,
and there
is a
limited
access
free
"trial"
that
will
give
you
a
pretty
good
idea
of
what
it's
all
about
that
might
make
your
decision
easier.
Better
informed
anyway. |
