| Review:
Erotic
Destinations
is a
sister-site
to European
Glamour
Girls,
so
this
is
just
a
brief
review.
Both
sites
feature
the
photography
of
Martin
Krake.
EGG
was
launched
first,
and
we
suggest
you
take
a
look
at
our
review
of
it
before
you
read
this
one
because
we're
not
going
to
repeat
ourselves.
Same
thing
goes
for
everything
we
said
about
technical
quality,
so
we'll
just
cut-and-paste:
"You
can
view
the
pics
in
three
different
sizes:
400x600,
500x750,
and
600x900
(you
set
the
default
as a
preference).
You
can
also
download
zip
files
in
an
even
larger
format
(up
to
2000x3000).
. .
.
Videos
come
in
two
very
good
formats:
640x480
.wmv
or
720x528
DivX.
Each
clip
runs
from
5 to
10
minutes."
A
couple
of
things
to
repeat
about
the
membership:
(1)
don't
get
the
trial
because
it's
limited
access;
(2)
for
a
bit
extra
you
can
get
a
double
membership
that
gets
you
into
both
sites. The
big
difference
between
the
two
sites
is
that
EGG
is
indoor
photography
(though
according
to
what
he
says
here
Krake
doesn't
have
a
studio
and
thinks
studio
photography
is
boring)
and
ED
is
outdoors
and
shot
in
what
may
be
considered
erotic
or
romantic
European
locations.
May
be
considered.
"An
abandoned
oil
mill
in
the
Provence
or
in a
village
of
ruins
in
Calabria?"
Abandoned?
Ruins?
Doesn't
that
mean
the
place
is a
dump?
Is
this
really
where
you'd
like
to
go
on
an
erotic
vacation?
Vegas
is
probably
just
as
sexy.
On
the
other
hand,
the
waterfall
in
Sardinia
was
kind
of
nice.
Oh,
and
here's
a
"pic
of
the
day"
to
look
at:
No
doubt
it's
about
this
point
you're
asking
yourselves
the
following
question:
Why
the
fuck
did
we
give
this
site
an
"8"
when
we
only
gave
EGG
a
"7"
and
it
has
twice
as
much
content?
(The
site
stats,
updated
every
other
day
here,
were
146
pictorials,
8,607
photos,
and
19
video
clips
when
we
visited.)
Good
point.
Here's
our
justification
(aside
from
the
obvious
answer,
that
this
is
all
subjective
anyway). (1)
It's
outdoors!
Not
such
a
big
deal
maybe,
but
we
really
didn't
like
Krake's
studio.
It
just
looked
too
much
like
an
Ikea
catalogue
layout.
Now
the
beautiful
settings
here
may
not
be
quite
as
magical
as
the
commentary
tries
to
make
them
out
to
be
(most
of
them
might
as
well
be
in
someone's
upscale
backyard),
but
the
thing
is
Krake
works
well
in
natural
sunlight
and
the
pictures
and
videos
just
seem
more
interesting
set
against
the
different
backdrops
you
get
here. And
the
landscape
does
seem
to
inspire
Krake
in
hard-to-define
ways.
The
photography
just
seems
more
alive. (2)
You
get
to
see
two
girls
together!
That
always
freshens
things
up a
bit. (3)
There's
a
lot
more
personality.
For
some
reason
this
site,
unlike
martinkrake.com
and
EGG,
gives
you
a
full
bio
page.
It
also
gives
you
extensive
shoot
notes
(they
come
in a
.pdf
file)
and
behind-the-scenes
coverage. There
you
have
it.
Despite
the
fact
that
this
site
isn't
as
big
as
EGG
and
doesn't
update
quite
as
much,
we
still
liked
it
better.
It
needs
to
grow
a
bit
to
be
in
the
very
top
rank
of
nude
photography
sites,
but
what
we've
got
here
is a
great
start
and
a
nice
original
concept
(the
porn
travelogue).
For
what
it's
worth,
and
this
is a
very
subjective
judgment
call,
we'd
be
inclined
to
just
join
this
site
and
pass
on
the
double
membership,
unless
you're
a
real
fan
of
Krake's
work.
The
$37
is
just
too
much.
Sure
it's
for
two
sites,
but
when
you
add
up
how
much
total
content
you're
getting
it's
still
out
of
whack
with
other
erotic
photography
sites. |
