| Review:
As
our
culture
continues
to
slide
down
an
oily
slope
of
moral
degeneracy,
the
line
between
pop
culture
and
porn
has
become
increasingly
blurred.
This
makes
celebrity
porn
sites
a
bit
of a
declining
value,
in
our
opinion,
since
so
much
is
now
in
the
public
domain.
Do
nipple
slips
and paparazzi
upskirt
shots
still
mean
all
that
much? Judging
from
the
speed
at
which
the
latest
Hollywood
starlet's
pussy-flashing
escapades
become
the
most
popular
downloads
on
the
web,
we'd
have
to
say
. .
.
Yes. The
thing
about
celebrity
skin
sites
is
that
they
(obviously)
aren't
producing
their
own
content.
They
are
all
basically
archives
of
material
that's
already
out
there.
So
the
question
is
how
much
stuff
they've
managed
to
track
down
and
how
well
they
present
it.
And
the
short
answer,
with
regard
to
Female
Stars,
is
not
as
much
and
not
as
well
as
the
leading
competition. Some
warning
bells
started
going
off
when
we
first
visited
the
site
and
realized
there
was
no
site
tour.
All
the
links
from
the
main
welcome
page
just
went
to a
join
page.
So
the
bold
claim
that
over
25,000
actresses
were
represented,
in 12,000
movies
and
1.3
million
photos,
was
hard
to
verify.
Indeed
we
couldn't
browse
the
collection
at
all
to
see
if
there
was
anything
we
really
wanted
in
advance.
Which
compares
unfavourably
with
other
top
celebrity
sites
like
Celebrity
Movie
Archive
and Mr.
Skin,
where
you
can
tour
the
entire
site
and
see
what
they've
got
before
you
join.
Once
inside there's
a
standard
breakdown
of
athletes,
movie
stars,
singers,
and
television
stars.
We
went
looking
for
pics
of
the
swimmer
Amanda
Beard
and
so
went
to
the
Athletes
section
and
clicked
on
the
sub-heading
"Athletes"
(other
sub-categories
included
fitness
girls,
tennis
stars,
and
wrestling
women).
This
only
gave
us
the
message
"This
feature
is
coming
soon.
Be
sure
to
check
back
often."
Bummer.
So
we
just
typed
Amanda
Beard
into
the
search
box.
We
got
to
her
page
but
were
disappointed.
A
lot
of
the
pics
were
small,
low-res
scans
of material
we've
seen
everywhere
before,
and
there
were
none
of
the
nude
Playboy
pics.
There
was
also
no
video
available
(at
Celebrity
Movie
Archive,
which
only
advertises
just
under
5,000
movies,
they
have
6
clips).
This
sense
of
disappointment
followed
us
around.
Only
4
videos
of
Natalie
Portman?
A
star
"rumored"
to
be
appearing
in
the
"new"
Indiana
Jones
movie
(already
out
on
DVD
when
we
visited)?
Only
1
video
of
Keira
Knightley?
That's
pretty
bad.
A
favourite
B-movie
gal
of
ours
is
former
Penthouse
Pet
Julie
K.
Smith.
We
found
two
pages
dedicated
to
her,
apparently
because
they
think
she's
two
different
people
(different
birth
years
are
given).
Hardly
any
video
and
poor
quality
reproductions
of
her Penthouse
pics
(centerfolds
reduced
to
340x480)
and
vidcaps
which
aren't
referenced
to
their
source.
All
this
from
a
site
that
says
they've
been
going
since
1995!
We
could
go
on,
but
you
get
the
picture.
Yes,
they
have
a
fair
bit
of
stuff
and
it's
decently
organized.
But
there's
also
quite
a
bit
of
sloppiness
in
the
presentation,
some
glaring
holes
in
the
collection,
and
the
quality
is
really
a
grab-bag
of
just
whatever
they
seem
to
have
found
lying
around.
Some
of
it
is
good,
but
most
of
what
we
saw
wasn't.
For
example:
Do
we
really
need
reproductions
of
DVD
box
covers
in
the
image
sections?
Come
on.
The
big
problem
though
is
that
there
are
some
really
strong
celebrity
sites
out
there
and
Female
Stars
just
isn't
in
the
same
league.
And
it's
not
cheap
either. |
