| Review:
Does
it
make
sense
to
write
longer
reviews
for
sites
we
don't
like,
or
for
sites
that
we
do?
Should
we
go
into
more
detail
explaining
why
a
site
is
so
good
it's
worth
joining
than
we
do
when
we're
just
brushing
a
site
off?
Or
should
it
be
the
other
way
around?
Fuck
Confessions
is a
site
we
didn't
like
very
much.
Didn't
hate
it
(that
takes
a
really
special
form
of
badness),
but
didn't
like
it.
Here
are
the
reasons
why:
(1)
The
background
music.
Annoying,
loud,
and
relentless.
Even
when
people
are
talking.
And
they
do a
lot
of
talking. (2)
The
video
quality
(technical). The
movies
here
come
in
two
formats:
"low
quality"
Windows
Media
and
"high
quality"
Mpeg.
Only
here's
the
problem:
They
both
look
exactly
the
same
to
us.
The
are
both
320x240
in
size,
which
(especially
for
something
advertised
as
"high
quality")
isn't
cutting
it.
The
playback
for
the
.wmv
files
was
only
around
400
kb/s.
The
mpegs
might
have
been
better,
but
sure
didn't
look
it.
Which
is
to
say,
neither
format
was
impressive
at
all.
And
they
look
terrible
when
you
try
and
take
them
up
to
full
screen.
(3)
The
video
quality
(production). One
word:
Lighting.
They
screw
it
up
indoors
and
they
screw
it
up
outdoors.
Even
in
the
interview
parts!
Fuck!
All
they
have
to
do
is
get
the
light
on
someone's
face
when
they're
talking!
And
yet
they
have
movies
here
where
you
can
hardly
see
the
girl's
face
because
it's
in
the
shade. (3)
The
concept.
All
reality
porn
sites
have
a
concept.
Some
are
better
than
others.
Here
the
concept
is
"up
close
and
personal
porn
interviews."
Supposedly
these
girls
are
confessing
their
deepest,
darkest
fantasies
and
then
we
get
to
see
them
come
true.
But
that's
not
the
way
it
goes
down.
It's
just
more
of
the
usual
idle
chit-chat
and
banter
with
the
cameraman
before
the
fucking
starts.
Every
reality
porn
sites
does
the
same
thing.
Sometimes
the
girl
doesn't
even
speak
English
enough
to
get
more
than
a
name
out
of
her.
Other
times
more
time
is
spent
interviewing
the
male
talent
before
the
shoot.
Which
actually
did
end
up
being
kind
of
interesting.
More
interesting
than
listening
to
the
girls.
Which
goes
to
show
how
boring
all
of
it
was. (4)
The
update
schedule. There
doesn't
appear
to
be
one.
Nothing
is
dated.
Judging
from
the
amount
of
content
described
in
the
other
reviews
of
this
site
we've
read,
it
hasn't
added
anything
in
at
least
six
months,
and
maybe
longer.
We
would
call
it a
dead
site,
but
that
would
imply
that
at
some
point
in
the
past
it
was
alive.
Which
we
doubt.
It
was
probably
just
launched
with
all
the
content
it
has
now
and
they
haven't
done
anything
with
it
since. (5)
The
layout.
Not
good.
We
found
at
least
two
of
the
episodes
incorrectly
labeled.
After
downloading
what
we
thought
was
a
scene
involving
a
blonde
with
big
tits
we
ended
up
watching
a
skinny,
flat-chested
Chinese
chick
getting
nailed.
Whatever.
Also
pretty
silly
was
the
way Belladonna--possibly
the
most
recognizable
performer
in
porn
these
days,
what
with
her
tattoos
and
her
gap-tooth
grin--appears
here
as
"Janine."
Really,
if
they're
not
even
going
to
give
you
the
name
they
usually
appear
under,
what
the
fuck
kind
of
confession
is
it?
So
those
are
the
reasons
we
didn't
like
it.
29
episodes
up
when
we
visited,
and
(as
noted)
it
doesn't
look
like
they're
adding
any
more.
A
few big
names
on
both
the
male
and
female
side
(including
Bella,
and
also
Sylvia
Saint
in a
lesbo
scene).
But
really
the
best
thing
about
this
site
is
that
membership
in Homecumers
is
included.
Judged
on
its
own
it's
not
worth
bothering
with.
|
