| Review:
MAY
2007
RE-VISIT
A
year
ago
we
thought
this
was
a
really
bad
site.
It
has
improved.
We
still
can't
call
it a
very
good
site,
but
it
has
improved.
And
they've
also
raised
the
price. Site
design
is
still
as
bare
bones
as
it
can
get.
Basically
it's
just
a
directory
system
with
two
folders,
one
for
photos
and
another
for
videos.
Yes,
there
are
videos
now.
In
fact
there
were
seven
of
them
up
when
we
visited.
They
aren't
that
great,
running
at
500
kb/s
and
formatted
at
320x240
(Windows
Media
files,
no
other
options
available).
Sound
is
muddy.
What
with
the
radio
or
television
playing
in
the
background
some
of
the
time
it
was
hard
to
hear
what
was
being
said.
Most
of
the
time
the
camera
is
set
up
in a
fixed
position,
often
too
far
away
from
the
action
(especially
considering
the
video
quality).
The
files
themselves
are
just
accessed
by
text
links
with
no
thumbnails
to
give
you
any
idea
what
it
is
you're
downloading.
Action
is a
combination
of
solo
posing,
hardcore,
and
blowjobs. The
photo
galleries
are
the
same.
The
actual
photography
seems
to
have
improved
(which
isn't
saying
much),
but
the
picture
size
is
still
just
so-so
(800x533). The
bottom
line
for
this
site
is
that
it
is
amateur.
Meaning
there
is
nothing
professional
about
the
production
or
the
site
design
or
the
girls
themselves.
In
particular
the
girls
themselves.
It
bills
these
women
as
authentic
Californian
ghetto
ho's.
And
that
may
be
true.
Most
of
them
we
would
just
call
brutal.
They
are
fat
(no,
not
"phat")
and
ugly.
When
they
fuck
their
floppy
tits
go
slapping
all
over
the
place.
To
be
honest
we
would
pay
cash
money
to
stay
away
from
chicks
like
these,
so
we're
not
sure
how
the
fuck
they
can
be
making
any
money
as
ho's.
But
everyone
has
different
tastes.
If
you
like
your
porn
squalid,
sleazy,
and
low,
low
rent
you
might
find
something
that
works
for
you
here.
But
it's
pretty
crude.
APRIL
2006
REVIEW
We'll
start
off
with
the
one
good
thing
we
can
say
about
this
site:
They
don't
make
any
false
representations.
Those
are
the
models
you
see
on
the
main
tour
page.
"All
of
our
women
are
local
women
and
they
are
ghetto."
And
this
is
what
they
say
on
the
About
page:
"This
Site
aint
[sic]
fancy,
cause
we
know
you
only
want
to
see
ghetto
chicks
with
phat
ass
and
tight
pussies.
Isnt
[sic]
that
what
you
came
here
for
anyways."
Get
it?
Nothing
fancy.
Just
local,
authentic
"ghetto"
women. Enter
the
members
area
and
you
have
a
plain
ImageFolio
directory
of
models.
No
thumbnails.
Just
a
directory.
There
are
43
"categories".
What
they
mean
is
that
there
are
43
models.
2316
images.
Click
on a
name
and
you
get
a
page
of
thumbnails.
All
the
pics
we
saw
were
800x600.
Poor
lighting,
little
effort
at
focus,
and
sometimes
large
parts
of
the
image
were
simply
missing. And
that's
the
members
area.
Absolutely
no
extras.
No
video
(despite
the
fact
that
they
are
offering
videos
for
sale--VHS
format
only
though).
No
writing.
Nothing
but
a
directory
of
2000
lousy
pics. Actually
there
is
something
else
good
to
say
about
this
site.
It's
cheap.
Real
cheap.
$3 a
month,
or
$20
a
year.
But
even
at
this
rock-bottom
"ghetto"
price
we
can't
say
it's
worth
it.
They
say
they're
updating
but
we
couldn't
tell.
The
stuff
may
be
exclusive,
but
given
the
quality
who
cares?
We
didn't
get
the
sense
that
any
effort
was
being
made
at
all
here. |
