| Review:
JUNE
2006
RE-VISIT We
have
to
start
this
review
with
a
bit
of
an
anecdote.
We
got
a
request
to
check
the
site
out,
and
we
did.
We
made
our
preliminary
field
notes
and
then
we
sat
down
to
start
writing
a
review
up.
Then
we
went
into
our
file
system
and
discovered
something
. .
. we
already
reviewed
this
site
a
year
ago!
This
was
actually
going
to
be a
re-visit
review!
We
had
completely
forgotten
all
about
our
first
review,
and
our
first
visit.
Now
we
figure
this
tells
you
something.
It
tells
you
that
this
is a
really
forgettable
site.
And
the
reason
it
doesn't
make
much
of
an
impact
is
that
it's
just
not
offering
a
very
special
experience.
Nothing
really
wrong
with
it,
but
basically
it's
only
an
archive
of
non-exclusive,
mostly
softcore
glam
content.
It
(obviously)
didn't
make
any
impression
on
us
at
all
the
first
time
around.
And
we
have
to
say
that
after
this
most
recent
visit
it
still
doesn't.
Anyway,
here's
a
breakdown
about
what's
better
and
not
better
with
the
site
this
time
around:
BETTER
--
it's
not
all
softcore
anymore.
They
do
have
a
number
of
boy-girl
sets.
Maybe
a
dozen
hardcore
movies.
But
it's
still
mainly
a
solo-girl
and
toy-play/masturbation
site.
--
the
language
problems
are
mostly
cleared
up.
Though
we're
still
not
sure
what
"Definitive
Adult
Content"
(or
"Definitive
Adults
Content"
as
they
have
it
on
the
logo
in
their
movies)
means.
"Premium"
or
"Quality"
adult
content
we
could
understand.
But
what
makes
adult
content
definitive?
--
membership
also
gets
you
into
Fetish
Series.
This
is
something
we
feel
obliged
to
point
out,
since
it
isn't
made
very
clear
anywhere
that
we
could
see
on
the
site.
NOT
BETTER
--
it's
an
extra
$5 a
month.
Still
a
reasonable
price,
but
it
has
gone
up. --
the
video,
which
wasn't
very
impressive
a
year
ago,
hasn't
improved.
Note
that
we
are
listing
this
under
things
that
are
"not
better,"
which
doesn't
necessarily
mean
"worse."
However,
given
how
much
the
state
of
the
art
in
video
quality
has
been
improving
in
just
the
last
year,
standing
still
is
not
an
option.
Movie
quality
that
was
acceptable
as
average
a
year
ago,
is
below
average
today.
This
still
wouldn't
be
too
big
an
issue
except
for
the
fact
that
they
make
such
a
deal
out
of
their
"high
quality"
video
on
the
tour.
It
isn't. --
the
update
schedule,
which
says
they're
adding
one
new
photo
gallery
and
one
new
video
a
week,
isn't
cutting
it
either.
For
an
archive
site
you
should
be
expecting
daily
updates.
It's
not
like
it
takes
them
a
while
to
produce
the
stuff.
We're
also
not
sure
they're
keeping
to
it,
since
according
to
our
last
review,
eleven
months
ago,
they
had
"just
under
60
clips"
and
now
they
have
90.
That
doesn't
add
up. So,
not
a
bad
little
site.
But
nothing
special.
If
this
is
your
thing
we
would
strongly
recommend
a
membership
at Twistys
as
an
alternative.
JULY
2005
REVIEW
First
off,
you
have
to
admit
it's
a
nice
price.
There
just
aren't
that
many
sites
left
that
offer
you
anything
for
$15
(the
one
obvious
exception
being
the
truly
amazing
$9.95/month
steal
at VideoBox).
So
that's
all
good. Site
design
is
clean
and
elegant,
but
it's
being
run
by a
Spanish
fellow,
with
English
and
Spanish
versions,
and
the
English
version
is a
little
rough.
What
you
are
told
on
the
main
(English)
entry
page
is
this:
"We
will
try
week
to
week,
to
be
bringing
the
best
content
for
adults
(Video
&
Galleries)
than
we
find
by
the
network.
We
will
try
all
costs
that
the
money
which
you
have
spent
in
your
subscription
itīll
be
compensated."
What
you
can
take
from
this
is
(a)
they
are
trying
for
weekly
updates;
and
(b)
the
content
is
not
exclusive
but
the
best
they
can
"find
by
the
network". Those
might
sound
like
somewhat
limited
goals,
but
at
least
they're
honest.
You
know
that
because
the
site
tour
is
totally
transparent.
Any
site
that
does
this
gets
bonus
points
in
our
book.
You
can
pretty
much
browse
everything
they
have,
and
see
how
they've
laid
it
out,
for
free.
No
surprises,
which
is
just
how
it
should
be. The
models
(of
which
there
were
160
when
we
visited)
are
mostly
European
amateurs,
with
some
name
adult
stars
in
the
mix.
The
"names"
are
the
usual
suspects
mostly,
like
Sydney
Moon,
Silvia
Saint,
Sandra
Shine
(just
to
stick
with
the
"S"
team),
etc.
The
action
in
the
photo
galleries
seemed
to
be
all
softcore.
Some
lesbian
and
toy-play
sets,
but
we
didn't
see
any
hardcore
boy-girl
stuff.
The
videos,
however,
do
include
a
bit
of
cock.
But
overall
this
is a
predominantly
softcore
site. The
pics
are
a
good
size,
usually
coming
in
at
around
1100x700.
There
were
just
over
200
sets,
which
can
be
downloaded
as
zip
files.
You
can
also
browse
through
a
model
index
that
links
to
photo
and
video
sets
if
that's
your
preference.
The
videos
are
also
nice,
with
just
under
60
clips
on
tap
when
we
visited.
There's
no
DRM,
and
for
downloads
you
get
a
choice
of
RealPlayer
or
either
a .wmv
file
(in
the
newer
movies)
or .avi
version
that
you'll
need
a
DivX
codec
to
play.
The
RealPlayer
files
are
smaller
with
worse
playback.
The
Windows
stuff
is
500
kb/s
and
looks
pretty
good. There
were
some
rough
spots.
The
updates
aren't
dated
so
you
have
to
sort
of
take
it
on
faith
that
they're
keeping
with
a
weekly
schedule
(for
what
it's
worth,
they
were
when
we
visited).
Browsing
the
model
index
we
noticed
that
some
models
didn't
have
thumbnails.
These
came
with
a
message:
"Model
preview
unavailable."
Why?
Also
some
of
the
same
video
clips
appear
twice
in
the
video
index
if
it's
a
lesbian
clip
(the
same
clip
is
attributed
to
each
individual
participant).
Something
else
that
might
lead
to
confusion
is
that
even
in
the
English
section
the
instructions
and
navigation
are
in
Spanish.
In
case
you're
wondering,
"Inicio"="Home"
and
"Ayuda"="Help".
Of
course
the
Help
section
is
all
in
Spanish
too,
so
it
might
not
be a
big
help.
Not
that
you
should
need
it
in a
site
as
straightforward
as
this,
but
just
so
you
know. No
question
this
isn't
a
bad
site.
It's
up
front
about
what
it's
offering
and
it's
cheap.
The
problem
is
that
it
doesn't
have
much
of
an
identity
or
personality
and
its
content
is
all
non-exclusive.
We'd
seen
a
lot
of
it
before.
The
fact
that
it
doesn't
hit
any
particular
niche
but
just
presents
a
collection
of
generic
softcore
material
doesn't
help
either.
It's
OK,
but
for
this
market
it
really
needs
to
have
a
lot
more
content
to
get
a
higher
score. |
