| Review:
(Note:
As
of
April
2007
this
site
stopped
updating
and
was
being
maintained
only
as
an
archive.
In
other
words,
it's
a
dead
site.
Conduct
yourself
accordingly.-Eds.)
APRIL
2006
RE-VISIT
Model
Flats
has
a
new
design.
It
looks
nice
and
it's
a
bit
easier
to
browse.
You
can
choose
from
a
selection
of
background
colours.
The
pic
size
is a
bit
bigger
(large
=
"up
to"
1152x864).
That's
all
good.
But
otherwise
it's
the
same
site. So
there's
really
no
reason
to
change
our
score,
which
was
just
average.
Look,
this
is a
pretty
good
site.
It's
got
a
lot
of
content
(33,000
pics
and
126
movies
when
we
dropped
in
this
time),
daily
updates,
and
some
cute
Russian
girls.
But
all
of
the
things
we
didn't
like
about
it
before
still
apply.
The
large-format
picture
size
is
just
average,
especially
for
the
erotic
photography
niche
where
large
usually
means
something
around
4000
pixels
now.
And
the
video
quality
is
below
average
(320x240
and
500
kb/s)
with
a
regular
membership. Yes,
you
can
join
at a
higher
rate
and
get
the
HD
video.
But
it's
a
bit
of
an
up-sell
deal
because
you
can't
just
pay
a
bit
more
per
month
to
get
it.
You
have
to
join
for
three
months,
for
$100.
Again,
for
sites
of
this
kind
that's
out
of
line.
You
can
join
Met
Art,
a
similar
but
superior
site
with
far
more
content
for
$99.00
a
year
(and,
by
the
way,
we
suggest
you
do).
Or
you
can
join
MC
Nudes
and
get
all
the
HD
video
you
want
for
the
price
of a
normal
membership. So
our
bottom
line
is
the
same.
This
is a
slightly
less
pretentious
version
of
the
standard
nude-model
site,
with
lots
of
solid
quality
content,
but
it's
still
just
an
average
value
for
this
niche.
JANUARY
2006
REVIEW
We
have
to
give
these
guys
credit
for
one
thing
right
off
the
top.
Yes,
this
is
another
softcore
nude
photography
site
with
lots
of
Eastern
European
babes
BUT
. .
. at
least
it
doesn't
have
that
magazine-style
layout
that
all
of
the
other
softcore
nude
photography
sites
with
lots
of
Eastern
European
babes
have.
Not
that
there's
anything
wrong
with
that
layout
(which
probably
started
with
MET
Art),
but
fuck
are
we
ever
getting
sick
of
it. Instead
of
the
magazine
concept
what
we
have
here
by
way
of
premise
is
the
idea
that
certain
flats
(apartments)
in
Moscow
are
being
rented
out
to
some
of
these
models
and
this
is
where
they
are
photographed.
This
premise
is
the
basis
for
how
the
site
organizes
its
content,
with
the
photo
sections
identified
by
where
(that
is,
in
which
flat)
they
were
shot.
This
leads
to a
rather
confusing
navigation
scheme.
Browsing
by
"flat"
leads
to
pretty
random
results,
except
when
the
flat
is
specifically
associated
with
a
certain
type
of
content
(like
Galitsin's
Flat,
or
the
Movie
Flat).
There
are
descriptions
of
each
of
the
flats,
but
these
aren't
always
helpful.
We
also
have
to
put
"flat"
in
quotation
marks
because
it's
not
always
a
flat
we're
talking
about.
Indeed,
the
Cyprus
Flat
consists
of
pictures
taken
of
the
models
during
a
trip
to
the
island
of
Cyprus.
Making
navigation
even
trickier
is
the
fact
that
there
are
no
quick
links
from
a
set
featuring
a
certain
model
to
other
sets
featuring
her,
and
no
search
function
at
all.
For
our
money,
your
best
bet
is
probably
to
just
go
through
the
model
index
and
forget
about
the
Flats
Archive,
but
that
might
not
be
as
much
fun.
And,
the
usual
literary
lapses
aside,
this
is
an
entertainingly
designed
and
written
site. Leaving
matters
like
these,
let's
get
down
to
business.
Yes,
this
is a
softcore
artistic
nude
teen
site
with
lots
of
pics
and
movies.
There's
a
counter
on
the
tour
that
gives
you
up-to-date
stats,
which
were
36,828
pics
and
147
movies
when
we
visited.
The
pics
come
in
two
sizes,
lo
and
hires,
but
we
thought
both
were
undersized
at
321x480
and
578x864.
Especially
for
this
niche
you've
probably
come
to
expect
much
larger
photos
than
this.
They
are
also
a
bit
more
direct
and
amateur-looking
than
the
artistic
nude
photography
sites,
if
that's
more
the
look
you
want. The
site
itself
has
a
clean,
if
somewhat
confusing
interface,
and
an
excellent
up-front
tour.
So
what
else
is
there
to
say?
What
sets
this
site
apart
from
all
the
others
like
it.
Just
a
few
things: (1)
A
greater
emphasis
on
girl-girl
action.
No,
it's
not
a
hardcore
site
so
don't
be
thinking
you're
going
to
be
seeing
any
nasty
lez
stuff.
But
you
will
see
a
lot
of
galleries
and
movies
featuring
two
girls
"playing"
together. (2)
These
girls
are
skinny.
Our
personal
preference
is
for
a
few
more
curves.
Sure
there
are
some
girls
here
with
a
few
extra
pounds
in
the
right
places
(like
Polina),
but
overall
the
Model
Flats
type
is
pretty
thin.
We
noticed
that
Galitsin
does
some
of
the
photography
(they
update
with
a
set
by
him
every
Thursday,
and
currently
boast
"dozens
of
hundreds"
of
his
pictures,
whatever
that
means),
which
didn't
surprise
us
given
his
predilection
for
underweight
angels.
So
if
that's
the
way
you
like
them
. .
. (3)
Also
like
Galitsin's
site
is
the
two-tier
membership
they
have.
With
your
base
membership
you
get
everything
except
the
ability
to
download
the
HD
videos.
This
means
you
get
a
choice
of
two
video
formats:
.wmv
320x240
(500
kb/s
playback)
and
.mov
240x180.
The
HD
videos
are
mpegs
at
720x526
with
a
bit
rate
of
up
to
4000
kb/s.
To
kick
your
membership
up
to
the
next
level
will
cost
you
an
extra
$5 a
month.
Whether
you
think
it's
right
that
they're
charging
you
extra
to
get
it
(you
can
get
even
better
video
from
MC
Nudes
for
less)
is
another
question.
As
it
is
the
videos
are
just
OK
at
the
basic
level,
but
they
letterbox
the
actual
image
a
bit
so
it's
even
smaller
than
it
sounds.
And
they
have
this
awful
electro-pop
music
soundtrack
overlaying
everything
that's
no
treat
either.
Of
course
since
the
girls
are
all
Russian
you're
not
going
to
hear
them
say
much
anyway,
but
even
natural
sound
is
better
than
canned
music,
at
least
to
our
ears. This
is a
pretty
good
site.
It
has
lots
of
content,
daily
updates,
and
it's
an
interesting
premise.
If
you
like
Russian
amateurs
but
aren't
into
the
artsy
presentation
and
professional
models
you
see
in some
of
the
magazine-style
sites
you
might
find
this
more
to
your
taste.
But
on
the
downside
we
thought
the
pic
size
needed
a
major
upgrade
and
the
video
was
just
passable.
There's
still
room
in
these
flats
for
improvement. |
