| Review:
If
you're
into
exposed
celebs,
nipple
slips,
simulated
sex
scenes,
and
fast-forwarding
every
(non-explicitly
pornographic)
movie
you
watch
to
the
"good
parts,"
you've
likely
already
heard
of
this
site.
In
fact
you
might
have
heard
him
on
radio
shows
like
Howard
Stern.
"Mr.
Skin"
is
the
brand
name
for
nudity
and
associated
sexiness
on
mainstream
film,
and
this
site
is
definitely
the
mother
ship. And
the
first
thing
we
have
to
say
is
that
we
love
the
way
it's
set
up.
The
design
is
colorful,
original
(we
are
so
sick
of
cookie-cutter
layout),
and
fun.
Some
people
might
object
that
there's
too
much
going
on--see,
for
example,
the
very
negative
review
by
X3
Guide,
linked
to
below--but
we
didn't
mind
that
at
all.
Mainly
because
there
is so
much
going
on.
We
enjoyed
browsing
through
all
the
different
features:
the
Top
10
lists,
the
interviews,
the
reviews,
the
"Anatomy
Awards,"
the
forum,
the
"Ask
Mr.
Skin"
area,
and
the
"Mr.
Skin
Minutes"
(short
radio
spots
discussing
the
latest
in
who's
showing
what
where).
Yes
it's
slick,
but
it's
also
well-written,
funny,
and
entertaining.
None
of
this
stuff
is
what
you
came
in
for
(i.e.,
it
is
not
jack-off
material),
but
it
adds
to
the
experience
and
contributes
to
making
this
an
outstanding
resource
for
the
nudity
connoisseur. As
for
what
you
did
come
in
for,
the
nudity,
the
news
is
mostly
good.
The
archive
is
very
large
and
there
are
substantial
updates
(usually
around
four
new
clips)
being
added
every
day.
At
the
time
of
our
visit
they
were
advertising
160,000
pics
and
clips,
which
we'll
have
to
take
their
word
for
since
the
way
it's
set
up
there's
no
way
of
really
checking.
The
search
function
and
index
work
very
well.
Basically
you
can
hunt
for
specific
actresses/models,
or
movies/TV
shows.
Or
you
can
do
broader
category
searches.
In
addition,
every
movie
is
cross-linked
to
all
the
other
models
who
appear
in
it.
So
not
only
is
it
easy
to
find
what
you're
looking
for,
you're
also
likely
to
turn
up
plenty
of
other
stuff
you
didn't
know
about
along
the
way.
Again,
not
necessarily
sexy
stuff
(though
there's
that
too),
but
just
interesting
trivia
and
information
you
might
find
surprising.
For
example:
How
in
fuck
did
the Hellraiser
franchise
get
up
to eight
movies?
The
last
time
we
checked
there
were
only
three
of
them.
And
only
the
first
one
was
any
good.
Where
did
all
the
others
come
from? OK,
enough
of
that
shit.
On
to
what
you
really
care
about.
Watching
the
"good
parts."
Some
brief
comments: (1)
The
video
seems
to
all
be
formatted
at
400x300
and
around
900
kb/s,
which
is
just
OK
in
our
books.
And
we
could
have
lived
without
the
red
curtains
they
use
as a
frame.
Of
course,
you
only
see
them
when
the
video
is
streaming.
You
don't
see
them
in
your
media
player
after
they've
been
downloaded. (2)
The
clips
are
all
kind
of
short.
Usually
around
a
minute.
Which
sort
of
makes
sense,
since
the
"good
parts"
in
most
of
these
shitty
movies
don't
last
very
long.
But
they
also
took
some
longer
scenes
and
split
them
up
into
these
shorter
clips
as
well.
Why? (3)
In
addition
to
the
clips
there
are
a
lot
of
pics.
Often
these
are
vidcaps
arranged
as a
"collage."
We
were
really
unimpressed
by
these.
For
a
site
like
this
the
only
point
in
having
pics
(which
are,
necessarily,
only
going
to
be
vidcaps),
is
as
thumbnail
previews. (4)
As
noted,
the
site
is a
huge
index
of
every
nude
(or
"sexy")
scene
on
video,
cross-referenced
by
actress.
Which
is
great.
But
what
makes
it
super-frustrating
is
that,
despite
having
a
very
large
collection
of
stuff,
there
are
descriptions
of
so
many
titles
that
there
are
no
clips
for.
It's
a
big
tease
to
see
a
link
to a
title
of a
movie
or
star
you
really
want
to
see
and
then
finding
out
that
there
are
no
clips
available.
Arrrrgh! (5)
Holy
shit
does
"simulated
sex"
ever
look
bad.
Yeah
we
know
the
whole
point
is
that
it's
fake,
but
after
what
amounts
to a
lifetime
spent
watching
hardcore
porn,
simulated
sex seems
so
un-fucking-believably
fake.
It's
ridiculous
watching
these
actresses
bouncing
up
and
down
over
a
guy's
mid-section
while
pretending
like
they're
having
a
fifteen-minute
orgasm.
Puh-lease.
A
worthwhile
comparison
would
be
between
this
site
and Celebrity
Movie
Archive.
Both
sites
have
large
archives
and
update
daily.
No
question
this
site
is a
slicker
production,
but
the
CMA
does
have
a
lot
these
guys
don't--and
vice
versa.
You
just
have
to
check
for
yourself
to
see
if
they
have
what
you're
looking
for
(which
you
can
do
because
both
sites
allow
you
to
browse
their
full
collections
before
joining).
For
example:
We're
big
fans
of
1993
Penthouse
Pet
Julie
K.
Smith.
Mr.
Skin
has
a
number
of
clips
of
her
(mostly
"simulated
sex"
clips)
that
CMA
doesn't
have,
but
CMA
has
her
awesome
appearance
as a
superhero
chick
on Erotic
Confessions
and
Mr.
Skin
doesn't.
So
it's
hard
to
say
which
is
better.
Another
difference
is
that
CMA
has
clips
from
the
sex
tapes
(Pamela
Anderson's,
Chyna's,
Paris
Hilton's),
and
Mr.
Skin
doesn't
cover
that
niche.
And
finally
CMA's
membership
is
set
up
so
you
buy
credits
so
you
only
pay
for
what
you
actually
download.
Mr.
Skin,
on
the
other
hand,
is
the
usual
monthly
membership
deal,
but
does
have
a
full
trial. There
was a
lot
here
that
we
really
enjoyed,
and
a
bunch
of
little
things
we didn't.
Overall
there's
no
denying
it's
one
of
the
most
fun
porn
paysites
on
the
Internet.
It's
classy,
informative,
witty,
and
well-produced. They
even
have
a
special
icon
alerting
you
to
where
in a
particular
scene
a
body
double
is
being
substituted
for
the
star!
But
we
wish
they'd
kick
the
video
quality
up a
notch,
and
ditch
some
of
the
ads
while
they're
at
it.
In
general:
More
impressive
as a
resource--sort
of
like
a
nude
version
of
the
Internet
Movie
Database--than
as a
porn
paysite.
And
no
doubt
that
has
a
lot
to
do
with
the
nature
of
the
material.
But
if
this
is
your
kind
of
action,
or
if
you're
just
curious,
we
recommend
at
least
getting
the
trial. |
