| Review:
FEBRUARY 2006 RE-VISIT
A
little
over
a
year
after
our
initial
review
we
got
a
request
for
a
re-visit.
Included
in
the
request
was
a
lengthy
(very
lengthy)
description
of
what
has
changed.
Seems
like
they've
been
really
busy.
Our
first
impression
was
that
it
sort
of
looked
the
same
as
last
time.
Same
girl
with
the
funky
toque,
same
monster
indexes,
same
ads
for
other
sites
on
the
main
page
(ugh).
But
these
were
just
first
impressions.
The
more
we
started
digging
around
the
more
impressed
we
were
at
how
they've
improved
the
experience.
It
has
the
feel
of a
Euroteen
Twistys
now,
which
is a
good
thing
to
be.
Here's
a
breakdown:
The
"Featured"
girls,
which
were
the
non-exclusive
sets,
are
now
called
"Bonus
Girls",
and
they're
in a
separate
section.
The
exclusive
content
is
of
the
"Choice"
girls,
and
they're
up
to 130
of
them
(with
two
being
added
every
week).
Some
attempt
is
being
made
to
develop
interaction
between
members
and
models.
A
private
messaging
system
allows
members
to
send
private
messages
(e-mails)
to
the
girls.
We're
not
sure
how
well
this
works,
but
the
webmaster
tells
us
that
the
models
do
have
the
ability
to
answer
and
that
the
average
answer
time
is 7
to
14
days.
Also
in
this
category
of
changes
is a
blog/diary
page.
This
didn't
seem
to
be
very
active
at
all.
Apparently
there
wasn't
enough
interaction
because
members
preferred
to
contact
the
girls
using
the
message
system.
So
it's
kind
of
dead.
But
from
this
page
you
also
access
what
are
described
as
"full-length
biographies."
Now
given
that
these
girls
are
all
in
their
teens,
"full-length"
is
obviously
a
relative
measurement.
In
fact,
each
biography
is
an
extended
Q&A
with
the
girl
describing
her
likes
and
dislikes,
past
experiences
(sexual
and
otherwise),
etc.
We
actually
found
these
to
be
really
interesting,
and
far
more
detailed
than
what
you
usually
get
in
such
potted
profiles.
They
certainly
add
a
personal,
authentic
touch.
There
is a
more
advanced
search
function,
including
a
really
interesting
"niche
locator"
thing
where
you
can
grab
all
the
pics
of a
particular
model
(or
all
the
pics
total)
based
on
whether
they
are
ass,
tits,
legs/feet,
or
close-up
shots.
A
good
idea
we
haven't
seen
before.
(After
we
wrote
this
we
went
back
to
the
e-mail
we
received
from
the
webmaster,
where
he
says:
"I
bet
you
have
never
seen
this
feature
on
any
other
site
you
have
ever
reviewed."
He's
right;
we
haven't.)
There
is a
rating
system
that
allows
each
model,
picture
set
and
video
to
be
voted
on.
Looks
good,
but
we
don't
know
who
the
fuck
is
rating
these
things.
A
number
of
the
top-rated
sets
and
models
would
have
been
nowhere
near
the
top
if
we
were
doing
the
rating.
And
other
girls
deserved
to
be
rated
much
higher.
Of
course
stuff
like
this
is
all
subjective,
and
whether
you
want
to
pay
any
attention
to
such
rankings
anyway
is
up
to
you.
We
just
shook
our
heads
and
moved
on.
The
videos
are
still
clocking
in
at
1100
kb/s
and
480x360,
which
is
good.
You
get
a
choice
of
downloading
2-minute
clips
or
full
videos,
which
is
also
good.
The
only
thing
we
could
have
gone
for
was
better
thumbnailing
here.
But
putting
all
the
videos
on
one
page
(which
we
didn't
think
was
necessary)
makes
this
hard.
There
has
also
been
a
second
size
for
images
added.
Most
of
the
members
area
exclusive
images
are
800x1200.
The
new,
larger-size
pics
are
1200x1800,
and
very
sharp
at
that
size
as
well.
Only
the
news
sets
are
in
this
second
size
though.
And
now
picture
sets
in
both
sizes
can
be
downloaded
in
zip
files.
There
is a
picture
post
message
board
where
members
can
post
pictures
from
the
site
with
a
link
from
the
members
area
and
then
talk
about
it.
Seems
to
be
quite
active.
Navigation:
They
say
they've
improved
this,
and
we
guess
they
have
(it's
been
a
year
now
and
we
don't
remember
it
that
well).
Still,
while
there
are
plenty
of
links
to
jump
around
to
the
different
sections,
and
it's
pretty
easy
to
get
where
you
want,
we
thought
it
looked
kind
of
messy.
Especially
the
main
page
of
the
members
section.
They
really
need
to
simplify
that,
there's
just
too
much
going
on.
And
we
also
missed
having
a
Home
link
on
every
page.
Once
you
get
into
the
galleries
you
have
to
keep
hitting
the
Back
button
to
get
back
out.
The
"free
DVD"
offer
has
been
changed
so
that
if
you
stay
a
month
and
buy
a
DVD
you
get
a
second
one
free.
Bonus
content:
The
webmaster
would
like
to
correct
our
earlier
opinion
that
"Spring
Break
Fuck
Adventures"
"looks
like
it's
all
licensed."
He
tells
us
that
it
is
not
licensed.
Fair
enough.
But
it's
not
really
"spring
break"
footage
either
(except
in
the
licensed
extras
area).
It's
a
bunch
of
generic
hardcore
scenes
that
all
seem
to
be
shot
indoors.
You
can
call
it
"South
Padre
Island"or
"Panama
City"
if
you
want,
but
to
us
it
just
looks
like
a
young
couple
fucking
on a
bed.
Which
is
another
way
of
saying
we're
not
sure
it
makes
a
lot
of
difference.
But
it
does
add
quite
a
bit
of
hardcore
action
to
your
membership
(around
70
movies),
and
that's
always
nice.
Also
included
is
Katrina18,
an
exclusive
solo
teen
site.
And
there
you
have
it.
Definite
improvements
across
the
board:
more
content,
more
updates,
more
personality,
more
member
interaction
and
functionality,
and
bigger
pics.
We
really
liked
the
lengthy
"biographies"
and
the
niche
search
function
they've
added
too.
Our
only
gripes
were
that
some
of
the
pages
still
had
a
cluttered
feel
to
them,
and
that
the
photography
could
use
some
more
style
and
imagination.
But
we
have
to
say
that
if
you're
looking
for
a
good
general
teen
site,
these
guys
have
established
themselves
as
one
of
the
leaders.
DECEMBER 2004 REVIEW
Do you ever wonder about movie reviewers who have to watch four or
five new movies a week and then write reviews of them? Do you think they
start to suffer from burn-out after a while? Maybe they get to feel like
they've seen it all before. They get blasé about it.
That was a feeling we started to get right away with
Nubiles.net,
which features a lot of softcore amateur teens. Nothing wrong with any
of it . . . but we've been here many, many times over the years. More on that
later.
Let's start at the beginning. Right off the bat you get some help
from the dictionary,
defining nubile as "a
girl who has reached sexual maturity, when a girl blossoms into a
woman" or "sexually mature or attractive. Used of young
women."
Do you know what all that means? It means teens! This is
a teen site, and nothin' but a teen site. And like most teen sites it's
mostly softcore posing, masturbation and toy-play. Note that when we say
"mostly" in this case we mean 95%. We noticed a couple of
hardcore scenes (that is, some girl doing a cock), but that was it. No
glam. Natural teen tits. Virtually all white girls, no ethnics. And do
you know what that means? Well, let's just say their English
isn't always the best.
So that's it for the nature of the content. Here are some pretty
typical sample galleries to look at:
For the most part the girls are cute, but nothing spectacular. The photography is
pretty generic. You don't see much variety from the staples like
masturbating on the sofa, on the bed, in the shower sets. Overall, this is not a site with much of an independent
identity.
For one thing, it has a lot of non-exclusive content. The girls come
in two main categories: Choice (which means they are exclusive) and
Featured (licensed). Different faces, but otherwise they are
indistinguishable. And you get a lot more licensed content than
exclusive: 45 choice models to 246 featured girls.
There is also advertising in the members area, cleverly disguised as
external site "reviews". No brownie points for that. In fact,
looking at the sites that are advertised led us to some invidious
comparisons. They pump ALS
Scan quite a bit, which is the same niche, but a better site in our
opinion.
Site design is pretty crude and unattractive. No attempt at a search
function--you just pick the girls from two mega-indexes of headshots.
Navigation isn't helped by the poor thumbnailing in both the video (one
thumbnail per movie) and photo (sometimes no thumbnails at all!) areas.
Even the writing is sloppy:
It is our goal to bring you the youngest and hottest nubile age women.
We update our members area often with fresh girls, high quality pictures,
movies, the truth and other bonuses.
The truth and other bonuses. What does that mean?
In fact, it does mean something. At least the "other
bonuses" part. We don't know what the truth means. Membership here
gets you a number of bonus sites with a fair bit of extra content. It
isn't entirely on target with this site's audience, but you also get
Drunk Spring Break Girls and Spring Break Fuck Adventures (which may, on
our cursory examination, be essentially the same site). This stuff looks
like it's all licensed, and the site design is brutal, but there
is a lot of public nudity/party girl video hidden away here.
Other negatives, while we're at it: The pages, and the downloads,
were slow. They also don't offer a full range of options for the video
downloads, with everything coming in one format (mpeg) and one bandwidth
(which for the newer ones is a solid 1000 kb/s). The photography and
video, while competent, is without any sense of style. Most of the
videos are around 20 minutes long in total, and are usually (nothing is
standard here) available for download as five or six shorter clips or as
one long full movie.
Now there are some positives to mention. As noted, you do get a good
chunk of bonus content. The site is updating with two new sets daily.
The "choice" photos are large and clear (the feature girls
pics are just average). There is a lot of video and the video quality is
quite high, allowing for fullscreen playback. If you stay for a month
they apparently give you a free DVD as well.
Our sense was that this was a large site, technically solid but
without a lot of care put into the design and quite generic in terms of
its content. The monthly rate is kind of steep too for the amount of
licensed material.
|
