| Review:
This is a small network of "reality" porn sites that we
were originally going to review separately. We gave up after Nasty
Housewives. In part this is because our general philosophy is that
most reality porn sites are all the same now anyway, and this one didn't
impress us as even making much of an effort to be different. But it's
also because the sites are so similar we thought we could kill 8 birds
with one stone.
So here's what's consistent: The menu across the top says: Home,
Pics, Video, Feeds, Live Cams, Live Chats, E-zines/Stories, Comics/Toons.
We'd like to do a survey some day and find out how many people actually
click on the "Feeds" or "E-zines/Stories" links. Oh
well. In case you're curious, these links are a total fucking mess. On
one site the "E-zines/Stories" link on the main page only took
us to the Comics/Toons page, which consisted of one interactive game
which we couldn't play because our access was denied. Not that we really
cared (we were doing it for you!), but this is a problem we found
happening a lot. The menu links kept taking us to the wrong page and the
feeds kept denying us access.
Another consistent gripe we had was with the inadequate video
thumbnailing. You just get one small screenshot and some random text
blurb (for example, on the Young Girls Wild site you can choose between:
"Freaky and horny defines these women", "Watch these
babes get freaky and wild!!", and "Girls, girls, and more
girls!!"). This is no help at all. And in one case even the thumbnail was misleading
because the movie was something else! That's unforgivably sloppy. In
addition, you are forced to jump through way too many hoops to get to
the video download page. You have to go to the video page, then click on
the thumbnail, then click on the clip you want, then go to a streaming
page and choose the download option. Too much fucking around.
As a general rule the videos are all 320x240 and the playback is
between 500-600 kb/s. That's not bad. But some of the videos come in the
form of one big file, other times they're split into clips. We also
thought the content throughout was too much of a grab-bag of bits
and pieces. None of the sites had any individual identity or
personality. There was no concept or idea being worked out and no
consistent cast. For what it may be worth, here's a breakdown of the
different sites (external links) and their content. We were unsure of
what the update schedule was in every case. A lot of the time all of the
photos and all of the videos were apparently added on the same day. The
photos aren't vidcaps, but they are small and sometimes (especially with
the two MILF sites) completely unrelated to the rest of the site.
College Porn: 19 vids, 19 pic galleries. Clearly not all of these
women are college girls.
Dirty Road
Trips: 13 vids, 3 picture galleries.
Dude Looks Like a Lady: tranny stuff. 13 vids, 23 picture galleries.
Young Wild
Girls: 15 videos, 5 galleries of wet t-shirt pics. Almost
identical content to Spring Break Hoes. Both sites are total grab-bags.
The video might begin during Mardi Gras, go to a wet t-shirt contest,
then show girls dancing somewhere, etc. Totally generic content.
MILF Explorer: also 17 videos. Very concerned that all of the content
was apparently added the same day (December 2, 2004). One of those
things that make you wonder. Actually we liked this site a bit better
than some of the others. A couple of the movies had the student/hot
teacher angle ("Why do you keep staring at my tits?" "I
can't help it Miss Watson. All I can think about are your boobs!"),
sort of like you find in the truly funny (well, at least we thought it
was funny) My First Sex
Teacher.
But every time we started to like something about this network we
found something else that really turned us off. Here there were 30
galleries of pics, but at least three of these were duplicate sets given
different names. Please! Do they think no one notices these things?
Nasty Housewives: see our review.
Spring Break Hoes: exactly the same generic drunk/party girl stuff as
in Young Wild Girls (above). 27 more random videos.
Vegas Sex
Party: 19 videos. Tend to be group related, but don't expect
"real Vegas sex parties!". No pics, though a pic area was set up.
Said there was something coming soon, but that was five days previous to
our visit and it was still unavailable.
This is a pretty rough job throughout. We weren't sure about
the update schedule, and there is just so much competition in the
reality porn network market nowadays we can't give this more than a bare
passing mark. Some networks give you a feast, but this just feels like a
bunch of scraps from the table. Does it have some good content? Sure.
It's not a total scam. The video specs are
not bad at all, and perhaps even better than many of the
competitors. And if college girls and MILFs are your thing, you'll get
some bang for you buck, no question. But it's really a dog's breakfast
and individually we would rank each of these sites lower.
|
