| Review:
Entry page: Yikes! Red background. Two girls in old Soviet
Union-style uniforms. They're even wearing army boots! Pics look kind of
fuzzy. Why is the URL for this site rgsex.com? The "rg" is Russian girls.
Also RGS is the name of the "private photo studio" (whatever
that means) that does this site as well as a couple of others (these are
listed as "Sexy Smokers", which is really "Smoking Bitch", reviewed here, and "Abnormal
Amateurs", which we don't know, but we do note that the title bar
of the members area of this site reads "Abnormal Russian
Amateurs", so maybe they're the same thing). They've been online
since 1998.
OK, so it's Russian. And as you might expect, the English is shaky.
Do we seem to complain about this too much? Maybe we do. It just seems
like it would be really easy to fix. Are there no professional porn
proof-readers? We'll do it. Just get in touch with us and we'll proof your whole site for a reasonable
rate. We can even do grammar! At least save yourself the minor
embarrassment of "So welcome enjoying our amazing girls" and
"I hope you've explored our free part very well before, but if
someone not, then, click on the region you wish to see."
Members area has a primitive look to it (has it changed since 1998?)
with a menu frame on the left side of the screen featuring ten
choices: Main Page, Anal, Bondage, Femdom, Hardcore, SDM, Teens, Videos,
Last Updates, and FAQ.
SDM? Now what the hell is SDM? Had us scratching our heads. Perhaps the
definition provided will help:
"This part contains solo, hardcore (lesbian) actions with
SDM."
Whatever. In case you're wondering, what it appears to mean is
d&s and s&m. That sort of thing.
These guys produce their own content (they are a studio), and seem to
be quite paranoid about
protecting it (though we couldn't see any reason to be so uptight). You
have to sign in with your password twice to get into the members area.
Then you have to sign your password to download individual movie clips.
Hell, you even have to sign in just to view individual pics when you
click on thumbnails. Consternation!
Under Last Updates there is no indication of when the last
updates occurred. It says it's updating weekly, but we couldn't verify
this. They also claim to shoot all their own content, but apparently
they license their stuff out to other sites as well (as "RGS Exclusive
Content Provider"). So you may have seen it before. In all
likelihood you've probably seen something very similar. In addition,
when we see something like "Model: No info, Birth year: No
info" we have to wonder about some of these claims.
Breakin' it down: Pics: 230 "galleries" of approximately 80-100 pics each.
These are large and sharp, but otherwise unspectacular. Most of the
action is very straightforward hardcore. The bondage and "SDM"
are the only fetish aspects. Some of the girls have hairy pussies, but
that's not a theme.
Video: Around 200 clips, all 4-7 megs, in mpeg and asf
(avi) formats. Same
action. Playback is decent at 500 kb/s. But there's no talking (language
barrier), no editing and no imagination or even variety in the shots.
This isn't a great site. What you get is like what you would
expect as extra or bonus content from a lot of other sites. Nothing
about it--technical quality, design, models, personality, fetish--sets
it apart. Most of it just looks generic and cheap. The monthly rate
isn't too bad (the trial, which is almost the same, is quite high). But
given the number of quality amateur sites out there we wouldn't
recommend it.
|
