| Review:
The
tricky
thing
about
reviewing
these
voyeurism
sites,
as
we
pointed
out
in
our
review
of Street
Blowjobs,
is
that
they
all
look
like
shit
. .
.
but
they're
supposed
to
look
like
shit.
This
is
because
they
want
you to
feel
like
you're
really
eavesdropping
on
some
semi-public
sex,
spying
on
things
you
shouldn't
be.
In
order
to
create
the
proper
atmosphere
they
give
you this
grainy,
poorly
lit
video
that's
supposed
to
be
"realistic".
Of
course
none
of
it
is
real
(do
any
of
you
still
believe
that
"all
real"
line?),
but
because
it
looks
so
crappy
you
just
might
believe
it's
real
long
enough
to
get
off.
It
didn't
work
for
us.
There
may
be
something
real
in
here,
but
we
found
it
hard
to
believe
that
people
fucking
in
the
dark
wouldn't
notice
a
spotlight
being
trained
on
them.
Though
they've
certainly
tried
hard
to
make
it
look
"real".
Get
a
load
of
this:
We
don't
want
to belabor
the
point,
but
there
you
have
it.
Now,
assuming
you
know
what
you're
getting
into
(and
these
pics
all
come
from
the
site
tour,
so
it's
not
like
they're
concealing
the
quality
issue),
and
that
you
don't
mind
spending
$30
a
month
for
video
that
looks
like
this,
we'll
move
on
to
other
things. An
earlier
(and
for
some
reason
more
expensive)
version
of
this
site
was
introduced
by a
chick
called
Nikita,
who
was
apparently
shooting
all
the
video.
Nikita
seems
to
have
disappeared,
but
from
the
name
(and
stuff
like
"handjob
in
the
nature"
and
"It
was
raining
night
and
so
recording
is
low
quality",
not
to
mention
the
spelling
of
"Magazin"),
we
take
it
this
is
an
Eastern
European
site.
And
most
of
the
porn
coming
out
of
Eastern
Europe,
let's
be
honest,
is
not
exactly
setting
new
standards
of
excellence. Site
design
is
really
basic.
Every
week
there
is a
new
episode
added.
These
come
stamped
with
a
graphic
that
says
"Hunted",
which
seems
to
have
been
lifted
straight
off
of MILF
Hunter.
Along
with
the
weekly
update
there
are
a
bunch
of
extra
or
bonus
updates.
Unfortunately
there
are
no
thumbnails
provided
for
these,
so
you
have
to
choose
from
a
list
of
items
like
"window
snooping",
"car
sex",
"intimacies
behind
the
curtain",
and "in
the
shower".
There
are
no
pic
galleries. There
were
only
19
of
the
weekly
episodes
up
when
we
visited,
all
under
10
minutes
long.
And
yet
only
the
most
recent
updates
can
be
downloaded
as
full
videos.
The
rest
are
split
into
short
clips.
This
doesn't
make
any
sense
since
none
of
these
are
large
files
(the
clips
run
around
7
megs
each).
The
format
is
.mpg,
with
a
320x240
screen
size.
We
couldn't
get
a
read
on
what
the
bit
rate
was,
but
. .
.
what
difference
does
it
make?
Even
if
the
video
here
was
640x480
and
2000
kb/s
it
wouldn't
look
any
better. Is
any
of
it
exclusive?
Really
hard
to
tell
with
this
niche.
The
site
tour
only
promises
"a
lot
of
100%
original
videos",
which
could
mean
damn
near
anything.
But
really,
with
such
generic,
anonymous
material,
what
difference
does
it
make?
Most
of
the
time
you
don't
see
anyone's
face.
Some
of
the
time
you
can't
even
tell
what
body
part
you're
looking
at. As
you
may
have
guessed,
this
wasn't
really
our
thing.
But
even
if
it
was
we
weren't
impressed
by
the
video
quality,
the
amount
of
stuff
they
had,
or
the
presentation.
Especially
given
the
relatively
high
price.
Unless
you're
addicted
to
this
action
we
suggest
you
keep
driving. |
