| Review:
Go to Teensgarden.com and the first thing you'll see at the top is a
picture--it looks like clip-art--of a palm tree. This is the TeensGarden
logo and it appear at the top of every page in the members section.
The palm tree is one indication that all is not right. What does a
palm tree have to do with naked teenage girls? Especially "the best
eastern European teens you ever seen"?
Answer: Nothing.
Then there is the writing. It sounds like the pidgin gang-talk from A
Clockwork Orange. Honest. You tell us what
the fuck this verbal porridge is supposed to mean:
"You could see biddy bone fuggy sluts with
silicon baps or/and bums. Natural East Europe barry teens recommended.
They’re flaming and fit in the fact. Just add to all that crystal
legible eyeful fotos of quality up to 1024x1280. Extremely grand
videos."
Bizarre. And creepy:
"We
have a highest quality resolution pictures and movies you are hardly to
find on another adult sites, you can download all pics in zip files as
well. And of course everyday fresh updating. All our girls from Eastern
Europe and you can get in touch if you would like to. Some of them could
happen your fiancee."
Enough of that. As far as we can tell, this is mainly an archive site (that is, they aren't
shooting their own stuff, but posting licensed content). Hence the
generic elements like the palm tree. And hence the generic photoset
titles: "Brunette in the kitchen", "Blonde ride and
sucking", "In short skirt", "Harest [sic]
Teen pussy". It doesn't sound exclusive. And it doesn't look
exclusive either.
The bit about daily updates is true. They are adding a new photoset
every day, seven days a week. So there's a lot of content (148 models
when we visited). Movie updates occur about once a week. But the site
itself is just a shell, without any individual personality or even much
indication that an effort is being made. The "last news" was
two months previous to our visit. Navigation is just done by a calendar,
with all of the updates arranged by date (going back to January, 2003),
or model index. The "top 5 models" and "top 5 videos" are also
linked from the main page. The video links don't take you to video pages
but to model pages. There is no separate movie section. The movies are
just clips that come with no info (running time, file size, etc.), and
just one thumbnail each. There is no editorial comment or guidance (which may
be a good thing given the obvious language barrier).
Some additional info: The movies are all DivX, so you'll need that
player or codec. We thought picture quality was good, but the action is
pretty crudely shot and we didn't hear any English. In fact, one movie
didn't have any sound at all. The pics came in two sizes, an original
size (which is, somewhat counter intuitively, the largest format) and
"resized" to 800x600. You can also download whole pic sets as
zip files.
Sets are grim. Photography is barely professional and doesn't help
the girls any. Action is about 85% solo posing, but some hardcore and
girl-girl stuff is thrown in as well. No real fetish. Peeing material is
advertised but we didn't see it/couldn't find it. As noted, the
navigation doesn't help.
Membership is steep at $24.95 a month. For this niche there are
better values out there.
|
