| Review:
Well
it
looks
like
all
of
the
good
porn
site
names
are
now
officially
taken.
Can
you
get
any
more
generic
than
"X
Nudism"?
With
a
name
like
that
the
site
could
be
about
anything. What
it is
about,
however,
is
public
nudity.
Lots
of
naked
girls
on
the
beach
basically,
with
some
flashing
thrown
in.
There
is
some
pretence
toward
making
this
look
like
a
"voyeurism"
site
(that
is,
the
girls
on
the
beach
don't
know
they're
being
watched).
But
this
is
about
as
believable
as
finding
girls
on
the
street
willing
to
do ATM.
It's
obviously
staged,
though
there's
nothing
wrong
with
that
in
our
books
since
it
means
the
video
is
better
quality
(much
better
quality)
than
the
usual
spycam
crap. First
off
we
have
to
say
this
is
an
ugly-looking
site.
It's
tough
to
navigate
(with
a
super-wide
homepage
header),
has
cheesy
graphics,
and
even
the
beaches
and
bikinis
look
kind
of
run-down
and
Eastern
European.
The
girls
smoke
a
lot.
Most
of
them
look
OK
(they
are
definitely
"average"
girls),
but
they're
sure
not
getting
any
help.
While
the
technical
quality
of
the
exclusive
pics
and
vids
is
surprisingly
high,
it
still
doesn't
look
good.
Or
at
least
it
didn't
look
good
to
us. There
are
a
bunch
of
different,
but
similar
sections.
Looks
like
they
are
all
updated
weekly,
which
means
the
site
as a
whole
is
updating
daily
(sometimes
twice).
Each
section
is
further
subdivided
into
"Last"
(most
recent)
and
"Full"
sections.
Since
the
Full
section
always
leads
off
with
the
most
recent,
this
struck
us
as
kind
of
pointless. Candid
Shots:
just
random
nude
beach
pics
(you
can
tell
they're
nude
beaches
because
you
see
guys
walking
around
with
their
cocks
hanging
out
too).
Not
exclusive
(some
of
the
pics
even
have
other
site
watermarks
on
them).
Nothing
sorted
out
either,
so
it
really
is a
random
jumble
of
unrelated
photos.
Since
the
galleries
go
back
over
two
years,
good
luck
trolling
through
it
all
(there
is
no
site
search
function,
and
you
can
only
navigate
through
the
galleries
page
by
page
with
no
general
index).
Pic
quality
is
all
over
the
map
too. Beach
Video:
video,
updated
weekly.
This
is
where
the
best
stuff
is.
As
noted,
it's
staged
but
it
looks
OK
and
plays
back
fullscreen.
It's
all
DivX
though
(or
streamed
with
ActiveX).
Files
are
35-50
megs
and
the
clips
run
2
minutes.
No
sound
to
speak
of. Exclusive:
looked
like
these
were
all
pic
sets.
They
even
all
have
the
same
name:
"Beach
Fun"
(so
why
bother
naming
them?).
Could
be
exclusive,
since
it
looks
like
a
lot
of
the
sets
were
shot
in
the
same
place
on
the
same
day.
Notice
the
gentlemen
in
the
background
of
the
following
sets
("Keep
your
heads
down
guys!
We're
trying
to
shoot
some
porn
here!"):
Nu
Show:
some
licensed
content.
Described
as
"More
than
nudism".
Don't
know
what
that
meant.
Indoor
posing,
some
dildo
action.
Sure
didn't
look
good. Candid
Video:
voyeur
beach
video.
This
is
more
what
you'd
expect
from
a
voyeur
site.
A
lot
of
long-range
stuff,
poor
quality
stuff. Public
Pic:
flashing
pics.
Throwing
open
the
trenchcoat
kind
of
stuff.
Some
of
the
girls
here
were
actually
pretty
hot. Public
Video:
flashing
video.
Same
sort
of
action
as
above. Hot
Pic:
"Hot"
means
there's
something
sexy
going
on.
This
is
where
you'll
find
the
boy-girl,
girl-girl
and
solo
masturbation
sets.
It's
not
very
hot
though.
No
intensity,
and
most
of
the
masturbation
is
really
fake. Hot
Video:
video
of
above. Live
Cams:
whatever.
We'll
give
these
guys
credit
for
some
things:
(1)
the
exclusive
pics
and
videos
are
pretty
high
quality
(if
unprofessionally
shot);
and
(2)
they
are
updating
daily
and
they
have
archives
going
back
several
years,
which
adds
up
to
lots
of
content
(around
150
video
clips
when
we
visited).
But,
on
the
other
hand:
(1)
a
good
chunk
of
the
content
is
non-exclusive,
and
most
of
it
all
looks
the
same
anyway;
(2)
navigation
and
layout
are
poor;
and
(3)
it's
pricey. As
a
bottom
line
it's
really
hard
to
tell
who
this
site
is
aimed
at.
It's
definitely
not
the
usual
Spring
Break
round-up.
If
you
just
like
looking
at
average
girls
naked
on
the
beach,
with
very
average
camera-work,
you'll
find
a
lot
of
it
here.
But
the
presentation
is
really
rough
and
there's
no
personality
at
all
to
any
of
it
(no
doubt
in
part
because
of
the
language
barrier).
For
$30
a
month
we'd
expect
something
a
little
more
special
than
this.
Like
its
name,
we
found
X
Nudism
to
be
pretty
generic. |
